<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ANZ bites the dust – rumbles in the rebrand jungle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peoplethings.com/andblog/anz-bites-the-dust-%e2%80%93-rumbles-in-the-rebrand-jungle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peoplethings.com/andblog/anz-bites-the-dust-%e2%80%93-rumbles-in-the-rebrand-jungle/</link>
	<description>An evolving design and communication story by Studio Pip and Co in Melbourne, Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:38:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://peoplethings.com/andblog/anz-bites-the-dust-%e2%80%93-rumbles-in-the-rebrand-jungle/comment-page-1/#comment-42559</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplethings.com/andblog/?p=3453#comment-42559</guid>
		<description>I think this is an interesting subject as I was just reflecting today, on two re-brands that have caught my attention this year (2009).
Qantas + Pepsi (cola)
I&#039;ve asked myself the question -Why did these guys/girls bother?
Both the QANTAS and Pepsi re-brands ( focusing on logo ) appear to be so minor that they may as well have stuck to their previous visual identity. I&#039;m sure the re-design would have been just a part of some larger re-branding campaign, however, the cynic in me suggests that CEOs and managers are catching onto the importance of design, which is fantastic, but some are overly conservative and don&#039;t quite get &#039;it&#039; yet.
I&#039;d hate to think that design is finding its way onto the corporate agenda for the wrong reasons, ie. Corporate Managers &#039;been busy&#039; list.
Go ANZ! At least they are buying into design whole heartedly, and not just dipping their toes into the vast ocean of intelligent creativity available in today&#039;s society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is an interesting subject as I was just reflecting today, on two re-brands that have caught my attention this year (2009).<br />
Qantas + Pepsi (cola)<br />
I&#8217;ve asked myself the question -Why did these guys/girls bother?<br />
Both the QANTAS and Pepsi re-brands ( focusing on logo ) appear to be so minor that they may as well have stuck to their previous visual identity. I&#8217;m sure the re-design would have been just a part of some larger re-branding campaign, however, the cynic in me suggests that CEOs and managers are catching onto the importance of design, which is fantastic, but some are overly conservative and don&#8217;t quite get &#8216;it&#8217; yet.<br />
I&#8217;d hate to think that design is finding its way onto the corporate agenda for the wrong reasons, ie. Corporate Managers &#8216;been busy&#8217; list.<br />
Go ANZ! At least they are buying into design whole heartedly, and not just dipping their toes into the vast ocean of intelligent creativity available in today&#8217;s society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simeon King</title>
		<link>http://peoplethings.com/andblog/anz-bites-the-dust-%e2%80%93-rumbles-in-the-rebrand-jungle/comment-page-1/#comment-38643</link>
		<dc:creator>Simeon King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplethings.com/andblog/?p=3453#comment-38643</guid>
		<description>Excellent summary of the whole dilemma of mega rebranding. I think you may have put it to bed for a while. But first before rebranding closes it&#039;s eyes for a long deep sleep...

The first ANZ logo, made of careful diagonal line cuts, was probably the first logo I can remember and totally admired for its geometric resolution. All ANZ logos have since paid some strange homage to the original but never got back to the same commanding strength. I do agree that perhaps they should now shoot for a symbol and not a logotype solution. 

nab=national star 
westpac=w 
anz=anz/flowerperson 
commonwealth=southerncross=sao with vegemite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent summary of the whole dilemma of mega rebranding. I think you may have put it to bed for a while. But first before rebranding closes it&#8217;s eyes for a long deep sleep&#8230;</p>
<p>The first ANZ logo, made of careful diagonal line cuts, was probably the first logo I can remember and totally admired for its geometric resolution. All ANZ logos have since paid some strange homage to the original but never got back to the same commanding strength. I do agree that perhaps they should now shoot for a symbol and not a logotype solution. </p>
<p>nab=national star<br />
westpac=w<br />
anz=anz/flowerperson<br />
commonwealth=southerncross=sao with vegemite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Food Favourites</title>
		<link>http://peoplethings.com/andblog/anz-bites-the-dust-%e2%80%93-rumbles-in-the-rebrand-jungle/comment-page-1/#comment-37245</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Food Favourites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplethings.com/andblog/?p=3453#comment-37245</guid>
		<description>when i received an email with the new logo i thought it was junk spam mail and didn&#039;t realise they had changed their corporate identity. i&#039;m actually not with ANZ so perhaps it was junk mail anyway about an account i don&#039;t even have. nice feedback you&#039;ve given. for me the symbol looks like a health care company representing mother and baby. looks to me like a corporate business company trying to be all soft and feeling to evoke trust and warmth but in the end don&#039;t they just want your money like all banks? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i received an email with the new logo i thought it was junk spam mail and didn&#8217;t realise they had changed their corporate identity. i&#8217;m actually not with ANZ so perhaps it was junk mail anyway about an account i don&#8217;t even have. nice feedback you&#8217;ve given. for me the symbol looks like a health care company representing mother and baby. looks to me like a corporate business company trying to be all soft and feeling to evoke trust and warmth but in the end don&#8217;t they just want your money like all banks? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

