Your ABC logo joins the heavy handed…

Brett Phillips from 3 Deep design tempted Nowality to rattle the cage regarding the recent “refresh” of the ABC’s graphic identity; Australia’s public free to air television broadcaster. So if this piece offends track down Brett as well.

The new year is usually the time for television broadcasters to launch a new season identities or overhaul the brand identity. The last tv brand that hit the Australian with a bang was Channel 7’s brand change on the first day of a new millenia in 2000.

pipandco_c7_080216.jpg

The new ABC brand has been launched with mixed reviews. A brand like the ABC has a lot of history, however over fifty years it has stayed almost the same – probably because it is a public service, rather than a commercial enterprise. The bigger-better-newer factor to attract high ratings and good advertisers isn’t a major factor influencing the development of the ABC’s marketing and brand. 

pipandco_c1_080216.jpg

The digital age has changed the broadcasting in Australia. Media providers have the opportunity to be multichannel broadcasters. As the ABC’s marketing video states – the new digital channel – ABC 2 introduced in 2006, didn’t link in with the existing ABC channel (or Channel 2), and an obvious branding problem transpired.

pipandco_abc2008_08021604.jpg

The new branding scheme launched in February is an attempt to fix the overall brand presentation. The mixed feedback of the new ABC 1 and ABC 2 scheme suggest that the solution is still a work in progress.

pipandco_abc2008_08021601.jpg

The current presentation to have too much going on; what was once a symbol, now has type, a boxed area and symbol too. The discrete on screen branding, or watermark, that has been enjoyed in the past is now a blatant expression. Today it is hard to watch a program on ABC 1 or ABC 2 without being bugged by the watermark in the bottom right corner of the screen – a type, symbol and an area of colour cluster. Blog sites around Australia are rumbling with the same comment.With all due respect to the team that put this scheme together – doesn’t at least one of these elements have to go? – the cluster of type, the symbol and the area of colour? I look at the new ABC scheme and think of my partner as she leaves to go out – routinely she will take a last look in the mirror, remove an something and walk out the door. The design team at the ABC seems to have taken a last look, tried to remove something, but market testing said no, and then launched the new brand campaign.We have taken the liberty of removing either the word ABC or the ABC’s symbol – lissajous curve, to make a point. The symbol and number seem to make sense.

pipandco_abc2008_08021602.jpg

pipandco_abc2008_08021603.jpg

As a design company, we will of course have comments on the tired choice of type – Din (we think) – a type choice that addresses the requirement of the design brief “for a modern, hip, trendy feel”. The current summer ident – bold stripes of red, white and blue creates a Bastille Day crossed with the return of Brit Pop impression, could the designer be french or english one asks?If it is any consolation the recent BBC multichannel brand solution in the UK is heavy handed too. It seems that in 2008 people have become less sophisticated visually and the trend to be blatant over discrete continues. Even though humanity is the most media savvy that it have even been in its 3.6 million year history.

pipandco_bbc2008_08021601.jpg

As the clip above clearly demonstrates, the watermark pre change was less of a distraction. Can the management and design team at the ABC give some further thought to this current watermark eye sore – the cliché type choice and summer colour scheme one can live with.

Watch the ABC’s brand launch promo here
1 Sources Wikipedia

3 Comments so far

  1. Andrew Hogg Design February 18th, 2008 10:05 am

    Terrific stuff big guy! Once again we are witnesses to a brand dilution brought on by a marketing department’s fear of the public ‘not getting it’. The answer it seems is to spell it all out ( which is ironic when you’re the ABC!). A once elegant watermark has become a stain in the bottom right corner of our box…

  2. Jim Antonopoulos February 25th, 2008 8:48 am

    I suspect that the ‘problem’ ABC were trying to solve with this refresh was a brand architecture problem brought on by the introduction of ABC2 but the lack of inspiration in the application is even more interesting.

  3. kevin blackburn February 25th, 2008 1:19 pm

    Whilst Brett’s attempt to add a nice bit of ‘DIN’ does look far better than the actual solution, it’s missing the point isn’t? Doesn’t the logo reflect the general quality of Aussie TV. Whilst I applaud the independent film scene, the content of our TV channels are dire. Repeats of US and BBC shows, reality shows galore…doesn’t the lack of consideration for good design stem from a lack of good homegrown content?

    Lets just go back to 1975 and get rid of all the go faster stripes - both the 7 and ABC logo appear more timeless. I can’t agree with the BBC comment, whilst as a logo it looks a little stayed (I prefer timeless), it allows the onscreen idents, which are second to none (other than channel 4), to come to life. The BBC content and brand speak for itself.

Reply